jsb
11-02 04:26 PM
My labour was filed for a software engineer position (java, udb, etc) 3 years ago. Over that time, my role has changed to a project manager. Infact I don't do any coding anymore. If I invoke AC21 after 180 days, can I switch to a Project Manager position?
thanks,
These are two different skills, unless you can manage to have job description of your new job to be the same as in LC. Or you can leave it the way it is, provided your employer intends to hire you as a software engineer upon approval of LC, and you intend to accept it. In the meantime, do whatever you want - project management or anything unrelated.
thanks,
These are two different skills, unless you can manage to have job description of your new job to be the same as in LC. Or you can leave it the way it is, provided your employer intends to hire you as a software engineer upon approval of LC, and you intend to accept it. In the meantime, do whatever you want - project management or anything unrelated.
wallpaper compaq presario cq56z.
gcwait2007
12-27 05:46 PM
Mine is at Nebraska
My I-140 is also pending in Nebraska, I am also in EB-3 category with labor PD 02/20/2007. Your labor PD is 03/2007 and hence it is surprising! I saw an approval for one EB-3 filed in April 2007 in but his PD is 2002.
I do not see any LUD these days in my pending I-140 and I-485. There was a soft LUD in my wife's I-765 (EAD already approved and received) about a month back.
Please keep us updated.
My I-140 is also pending in Nebraska, I am also in EB-3 category with labor PD 02/20/2007. Your labor PD is 03/2007 and hence it is surprising! I saw an approval for one EB-3 filed in April 2007 in but his PD is 2002.
I do not see any LUD these days in my pending I-140 and I-485. There was a soft LUD in my wife's I-765 (EAD already approved and received) about a month back.
Please keep us updated.
narasimha.cse@gmail.com
11-20 08:25 PM
Thanks a lot for your suggestion,
Can you please brief me out regarding the procedure . I know this sounds very basics but I am pretty new to the country and the procedures .
Hope you understand ,
Thanks in advance,
Narasimha
Can you please brief me out regarding the procedure . I know this sounds very basics but I am pretty new to the country and the procedures .
Hope you understand ,
Thanks in advance,
Narasimha
2011 Simple Specifications:
rkumar18
09-26 07:23 PM
I didn't get the EAD too...
I am in the same situation.........
__________________
Labor : EB2 PD March 2005
I-140 NSC 10/2006
I-485 & I-765 - NSC - signed by R. Williams at 7:55 AM
Self & Spouse
I-485 July 2nd Filed - WACXXXX - Case Transferred to NSC.
I-765 July 2nd Filed - EAD Received
Reply With Quote
I am in the same situation.........
__________________
Labor : EB2 PD March 2005
I-140 NSC 10/2006
I-485 & I-765 - NSC - signed by R. Williams at 7:55 AM
Self & Spouse
I-485 July 2nd Filed - WACXXXX - Case Transferred to NSC.
I-765 July 2nd Filed - EAD Received
Reply With Quote
more...
ajay
12-24 01:22 PM
Create a new account using the following and follow the rest:
https://efiling.uscis.dhs.gov/efile/
Click on new user, then check mark the privacy policy then it will guide you step by step.
It is a renewal and it costs $340 to you.
https://efiling.uscis.dhs.gov/efile/
Click on new user, then check mark the privacy policy then it will guide you step by step.
It is a renewal and it costs $340 to you.
kirupa
01-12 02:54 PM
It also depends on whether you are creating a WPF app or a WinForms app. There are several built-in classes that automate the process of you playing sounds, so let me know what language and platform you are writing on.
more...
logiclife
07-06 04:49 PM
There is a policy for accepting asylees from Cuba and allowing them to seek permenant residency.
Its called the wet feet/dry feet policy. See Here on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_Feet/Dry_Feet_Policy)
The wet feet, dry feet policy (sometimes called the wet-foot, dry-foot Policy) is the name given to a consequence of the 1995 revision of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 that says, essentially, that anyone who fled Cuba and got into the United States would be allowed to pursue residency a year later. After talks with the Cuban government, the Clinton administration came to an agreement with Cuba that it would stop admitting people found at sea. Since then, in what has become known as the "wet feet, dry feet" policy, a Cuban caught on the waters between the two nations, "wet feet", would summarily be sent home or to a third country. One who makes it to shore, "dry feet", gets a chance to remain in the United States, and later would qualify for U.S. citizenship.
You better carry a nice towel with you when you come back from Cuba and make sure your feet are dry when apprehended by coast guard. And make sure you dont end up getting kidnapped and killed in Cuba, coz they really dont have very nice law enforcement.
Its called the wet feet/dry feet policy. See Here on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_Feet/Dry_Feet_Policy)
The wet feet, dry feet policy (sometimes called the wet-foot, dry-foot Policy) is the name given to a consequence of the 1995 revision of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 that says, essentially, that anyone who fled Cuba and got into the United States would be allowed to pursue residency a year later. After talks with the Cuban government, the Clinton administration came to an agreement with Cuba that it would stop admitting people found at sea. Since then, in what has become known as the "wet feet, dry feet" policy, a Cuban caught on the waters between the two nations, "wet feet", would summarily be sent home or to a third country. One who makes it to shore, "dry feet", gets a chance to remain in the United States, and later would qualify for U.S. citizenship.
You better carry a nice towel with you when you come back from Cuba and make sure your feet are dry when apprehended by coast guard. And make sure you dont end up getting kidnapped and killed in Cuba, coz they really dont have very nice law enforcement.
2010 compaq presario cq56z.
franklin
08-24 11:16 AM
Its fine for me in Firefox. Do you have flashblock or other type extension installed?
more...
jkamel5
06-06 02:49 AM
Hi,
I just got my H1B visa and I am working. My wife is currently on F-1/OPT. We are both in the USA. Could you please advise me what is the required documents/steps to apply for her for H4 visa? are there any inf on the web? can I do that myself?
Thank you,
John
I just got my H1B visa and I am working. My wife is currently on F-1/OPT. We are both in the USA. Could you please advise me what is the required documents/steps to apply for her for H4 visa? are there any inf on the web? can I do that myself?
Thank you,
John
hair compaq presario cq56z series.
h1b_forever
08-08 07:49 PM
Must read for all EB3
Why should there be a restriction on premium processing ?
You should be eligible.
Moving to the Faster Lane : Changing EB3 to EB2 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eb3to2.html)
Case Study: Upgrade from EB3 to EB2 (http://www.imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-06/case_study_upgrade_from_eb3_to_eb2.html)
Why should there be a restriction on premium processing ?
You should be eligible.
Moving to the Faster Lane : Changing EB3 to EB2 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eb3to2.html)
Case Study: Upgrade from EB3 to EB2 (http://www.imminfo.com/News/Newsletter/2010-06/case_study_upgrade_from_eb3_to_eb2.html)
more...
PD_Dec2002
06-20 10:30 PM
please reply gurus.
Remember, you are signing each and every form. Which means you are certifying the following: "I certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that this application and the evidence submitted with it is all true and correct."
So when a form asks for your address, it HAS to be YOUR address. Providing any other address would be illegal. Tell your employer he/she cannot force you to commit perjury.
Thanks,
Jayant
Remember, you are signing each and every form. Which means you are certifying the following: "I certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that this application and the evidence submitted with it is all true and correct."
So when a form asks for your address, it HAS to be YOUR address. Providing any other address would be illegal. Tell your employer he/she cannot force you to commit perjury.
Thanks,
Jayant
hot Compaq Presario CQ56Z 2.3GHz 15.6quot; Notebook $350 at HP
Max
04-22 05:35 PM
My previuos company had filed two 140. One based on old labor process and the new one on PERM. New one got approved and my 485/EAD/ AP was filed based on approved 140. After 180 days I joined new company using my EAD and AC21. My previous company then withdrew my old 140 (which was still pending). My new 140 is still approved. USCIS denied my and my family's 485 based on withdrawl of old pending 140.
What are my options to fix this mess?
I am distraught. Please help me urgently and any suggestions would be welcome...
What are my options to fix this mess?
I am distraught. Please help me urgently and any suggestions would be welcome...
more...
house compaq presario cq56z-200.
Blog Feeds
03-08 08:50 AM
This report should be required viewing for every member of Congress and every US immigration official working on H-1B visa processing. Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/03/nbc-news-restrictive-h-1b-policies-are-a-job-killer-for-americans.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/03/nbc-news-restrictive-h-1b-policies-are-a-job-killer-for-americans.html)
tattoo compaq presario cq56z series. 2010 Exciting news for David Cook the last
irukandji
02-14 12:54 PM
Thanks for the quick reponse. That information is quiet useful.
more...
pictures dresses a part of the M880G compaq presario cq56z series. hair The unaltered
Blog Feeds
05-30 12:30 PM
Silicon Valley Immigration Lawyer Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
Across Silicon Valley and the rest of the U.S., many employers are avoiding layoffs by reducing employee hours or by cutting salaries. However, H-1B visa (http://www.geelaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1054805.html)holders, and their employers, can run afoul of U.S. immigration laws if the salary is cut without a corresponding reduction in hours.
An H-1B employer must attest to the Department of Labor, that the employer is paying the H-1B employee the higher of either: 1) the prevailing wage for the same occupational classification in the same area of employment, or 2) the actual wage level paid by the employer to all employees with similar experience and qualifications for the same job. When submitting the H-1B petition, the employer must state the number of hours per week that they will employ the H-1B worker. So if the prevailing wage for a software engineer in the San Jose metropolitan area is $40/hr., then for a full-time job the annual salary would be $83,200. This would be the minimum that the employer would need to pay annually, and an employer could always pay more.
Suppose your Palo Alto employer informs you that all professionals are taking an across-the-board 15% pay cut. If the prevailing wage for your job is $83,200, a 15% pay cut would lower your salary to $70,720. If your employer started paying you only $70,720 annually while you were still working full-time, your employer would be violating the H-1B regulations, and you could be in violation of your H1-B status. However, if your hours were reduced to only 34 hours per week, then at $40/hour you would earn $70,720 annually. Therefore, an employer and its H-1B employee could properly follow the H-1B regulations by reducing the employee's hours enough to still comply with the prevailing wage. Of course, in this example, the H-1B employee would only be able to work 34 hours per week.
More... (http://www.siliconvalleyimmigrationlawyer.com/2009/11/a-paycut-could-mean-parttime-f.html)
Across Silicon Valley and the rest of the U.S., many employers are avoiding layoffs by reducing employee hours or by cutting salaries. However, H-1B visa (http://www.geelaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1054805.html)holders, and their employers, can run afoul of U.S. immigration laws if the salary is cut without a corresponding reduction in hours.
An H-1B employer must attest to the Department of Labor, that the employer is paying the H-1B employee the higher of either: 1) the prevailing wage for the same occupational classification in the same area of employment, or 2) the actual wage level paid by the employer to all employees with similar experience and qualifications for the same job. When submitting the H-1B petition, the employer must state the number of hours per week that they will employ the H-1B worker. So if the prevailing wage for a software engineer in the San Jose metropolitan area is $40/hr., then for a full-time job the annual salary would be $83,200. This would be the minimum that the employer would need to pay annually, and an employer could always pay more.
Suppose your Palo Alto employer informs you that all professionals are taking an across-the-board 15% pay cut. If the prevailing wage for your job is $83,200, a 15% pay cut would lower your salary to $70,720. If your employer started paying you only $70,720 annually while you were still working full-time, your employer would be violating the H-1B regulations, and you could be in violation of your H1-B status. However, if your hours were reduced to only 34 hours per week, then at $40/hour you would earn $70,720 annually. Therefore, an employer and its H-1B employee could properly follow the H-1B regulations by reducing the employee's hours enough to still comply with the prevailing wage. Of course, in this example, the H-1B employee would only be able to work 34 hours per week.
More... (http://www.siliconvalleyimmigrationlawyer.com/2009/11/a-paycut-could-mean-parttime-f.html)
dresses Dimensions :38.4 x 26.5 x
Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
more...
makeup compaq presario cq56z series.
handless
04-16 03:21 PM
Well glad you like it i do agree it is a bit gory but most the stuff i do is gory i dont know i guess it comes from my obsession with horror and slasher flicks.
girlfriend compaq presario cq56z-200. more makeup Ugly Betty Season 4 cast ugly betty
paskal
08-27 01:56 PM
Pezz,
I hope you get some good suggestions- just a little thing- your attorney does not have to be located where you are, a lot of people deal long distance!
Please don't forget to join your state chapter and sign up for the rally. We are counting on a strong presence from the Philadelphia area and indeed all PA!
I hope you get some good suggestions- just a little thing- your attorney does not have to be located where you are, a lot of people deal long distance!
Please don't forget to join your state chapter and sign up for the rally. We are counting on a strong presence from the Philadelphia area and indeed all PA!
hairstyles Lenovo has introduced Lenovo
NikNikon
August 12th, 2005, 02:47 PM
Looking for something like this?
NikNikon
October 25th, 2006, 09:21 PM
Barring the obvious differences like the larger viewfinder & LCD screen which are good and the frustrating differences such as not being able to re use the batteries from the D70 along with the switch to the SD card. The pleasant surprise comes when setting down to do a post edit after shooting and seeing the improved image quality. The first thing I noticed was the greater detail in the eyes. I've uploaded two images cropped and untouched taken straight from the camera. Both were shot under similar conditions, overcast day, both in a wooded area with trees overhead and a fill flash used in both. The first image is from the D70 and the second is from the D80. This very well could be a battle of the lenses as well, 70-300mm vs the 18-200mm, both Nikkor. Regardless of which is responsible for the improvements I like what I see.
suny_saini
08-04 06:40 AM
my name was not interview with my family.
my family gave interview and embassy asked for original I140 and I824 approval notices to check my eligibility.
i submitted and now after 2 weaks got the follwing reply:
In your case , the I-140 was filed on sept 10, 2001 and approved on october 08, 2003. The visa became available on october 08, 2003 . Form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa became available. <my name> was born on January 03, 1986. because he (me) is above 21 years old an immigrant visa as a derivative beneficiary of Employment third prefrence (e3) immigrant visa category cannot be inssued to <my name>. In order to qualify for a visa, he (me) would need to benifit from CSPA. Since form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa becoming available on October 08, 2003.
<my name> cannot be processed under CSPA.
but i think and i am not sure if i am right or wrong that I824 can be filed after issuance of green card, but at that time my dad ddnt got green card.
SO plz help me with right advice and solution so that i can travel with my family.
my mom and bro got te visa and it will expire in 6 monts and i want to go with them, can i be able to get visa in any case before their visa expire?
i badly need help.
my family gave interview and embassy asked for original I140 and I824 approval notices to check my eligibility.
i submitted and now after 2 weaks got the follwing reply:
In your case , the I-140 was filed on sept 10, 2001 and approved on october 08, 2003. The visa became available on october 08, 2003 . Form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa became available. <my name> was born on January 03, 1986. because he (me) is above 21 years old an immigrant visa as a derivative beneficiary of Employment third prefrence (e3) immigrant visa category cannot be inssued to <my name>. In order to qualify for a visa, he (me) would need to benifit from CSPA. Since form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa becoming available on October 08, 2003.
<my name> cannot be processed under CSPA.
but i think and i am not sure if i am right or wrong that I824 can be filed after issuance of green card, but at that time my dad ddnt got green card.
SO plz help me with right advice and solution so that i can travel with my family.
my mom and bro got te visa and it will expire in 6 monts and i want to go with them, can i be able to get visa in any case before their visa expire?
i badly need help.
No comments:
Post a Comment